News

John Major “completely underestimated the scale” of Lottery impact

The former Prime Minister says he recognises the value of the arts in the life of the nation, but rejects the use of Lottery money for "government schemes."

Liz Hill
2 min read

MPs are not disinterested in the arts, but are “merely overwhelmed by other duties”, and “competing demands – health, education, social welfare, defence and many others – …obviously, must take precedence” according to former Prime Minister John Major. Reported in ‘Create’, a new Arts Council England publication putting forward justifications for public funding of the arts and culture, he cited their value in enhancing “ the life and wellbeing of the nation”, and the way they generate ‘soft power’ on the international stage. But when asked whether Government could go further with arts funding and examine how it could help with other priorities, in education or public health, he replied: “I would keep the arts distinct, and any government at bay. Lottery money is not, and never was, intended for government schemes. If the government has priorities over and above what the Exchequer can provide, it should tax for them.”

As Prime Minister, Major set up the National Lottery to provide additional money for good causes and “took steps to ensure it would remain free of government interference.” He explained that the Lottery has exceed his expectations: “I certainly expected the Lottery to make a difference, but completely underestimated the scale of it. I had hoped that up to a billion pounds a year would be raised for good causes. In fact, the Lottery has already distributed over £30 billion.” Major’s comments coincide with the 20th anniversary of the launch of the National Lottery.