• Share on Facebook
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Linkedin
  • Share by email
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Linkedin
  • Share by email

English National Opera Chair says the longer time frame will help the company “successfully deliver a new base out of London, whilst maintaining a season at the London Coliseum”.

Dome of the London Coliseum, home to English National Opera
Dome of the London Coliseum, home to English National Opera
Photo: 

Gareth Williams via Flickr

Arts Council England (ACE) has extended the deadline for English National Opera (ENO) to move its headquarters out of London by three years from March 2026 to March 2029.

A joint statement from the two parties, released today (27 July), says the additional three years “will mean more stability, allow for consultation with staff, more work in London and more time for the ENO to develop partnerships in the new city and to establish a programme there”.

It also confirms ENO expects to announce the new city that will host its headquarters by December this year.

READ MORE:

The announcement comes shortly after the publication of a study by global consultancy firm PwC which warned of “potential pathways of economic harm”, including lower audience numbers, reduced income and possible closure, if the opera is to relocate.

Meanwhile, ACE has confirmed it will be investing £35.46m in the ENO between 2023 and 2026.

The investment is made up of a £11.46m grant for 2023-24 agreed in January and, conditional on the ENO producing a revised and agreed business plan, a further £24m between 2024 and 2026, that was first announced in April.

ACE and ENO’s latest statement says the £24m investment will see the opera “deliver a substantial opera season every year in London while developing a significant performance and engagement programme in their new city”.

It adds both parties share ambition for the opera house to be in a strong position to apply for ACE’s next national portfolio of funded organisations from 2026.

‘Unwavering’ support

ACE Chair, Sir Nicholas Serota, says the additional two-year investment comes after ENO presented “inspiring ideas to bring their excellent work to people beyond the capital and to explore a range of new ways of presenting opera”.

He added the extended timeline for their transition to a new main base “will enable the ENO to undertake this complex move and to develop partnerships in the new city”.

“The Arts Council’s support for opera is unwavering, and we are excited by the ENO’s new plans and by the enthusiasm shown by the potential host cities.”

Dr Harry Brünjes, ENO Chair, commented the opera house is “pleased that ACE supports the artistic plans we have proposed in tandem with our longstanding wish to engage with new audiences and partners around the country”.

“We welcome this investment and additional time which we believe will help us to successfully develop a new main base out of London, whilst maintaining a season at the London Coliseum.”

The agreement between the two parties has also been welcomed by Culture Secretary Lucy Frazer: “ I look forward to seeing the plan as it develops to make sure more people across the country can experience its fantastic work,” she said.

Author(s): 
Arts Professional welcomes readers' opinions. Please ensure your comments observe our policy.

Comments

Best of luck to ENO but the article barely scratched the surface of the problem facing the Arts which is the sheer incompetence and mismanagement by the Arts Council and its current relationship with the DCMS. Throw in the lack of art form policies and a flawed strategy - Let's Create and you have the current shambles A prima facie example is the treatment of lottery funding. In 2018/22 as well as receiving core funding from the Lottery, Arts Council England’s National Portfolio Organisations were awarded over half of all Strategic and Capital funding. In 2022/2023, £129.57m of lottery funding was allocated to NPOs and ENO The Arts Council has raided lottery funds to shore up NPOs. This is not a level playing field nor is it leveling up, it is discriminatory and levels down as individuals and organisations such as jazz musicians and bands will apply and be turned down due to the insufficiency of lottery funds. The Arts Council and the DCMS have abrogated the core concept of “additionality”. Heads should be rolling at the Arts Council and the DCMS with a root and branch review of the Arts Council, its management, and its relationship with the DCMS, then other types of music and art forms will get a place in the sun